Trump's original order barred entry from all citizens of those countries and also established a 120-day moratorium in the United State's refugee resettlement program. The court, which tapering the scope of the lower court rulings that had completely congested his 6 March executive order, said it would hear arguments in the month of October.
Monday's ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court to reinstate President Donald Trump's travel ban pleased U.S. Sen. The ban against citizens in six majority-Muslim countries is still on hold as applied to non-citizens with bona fide relationships in the U.S. However, I'm particularly concerned that banning people from the United States due to their country of origin sends a chilling message to all worldwide students that we are not a welcoming place. The court said the administration can block travellers from Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Libya, Iran and Yemen unless they can prove a "bona fide relationship" with a person or entity in the United States.
In March, Trump issued the narrower order.
The government is advising all people planning travel to the U.S.to verify admission requirements ahead of time. If that is the case, then we should be making every effort to create connections and ties through robust global exchange and travel, and we call on the administration to make clear in its guidance that prospective students and scholars should not be afraid to seek admission to the United States regardless of their current ties.
The U.S. Supreme Court will take up the case in October. But they voiced concern the administration would interpret the ban as broadly as it could.
"This is a complete and utter vindication of the president", Gorka said.
Sea-Tac Airport will begin enforcing part of the Trump administration's travel ban beginning Thursday. "An American individual or entity that has a bona fide relationship with a particular person seeking to enter the country as a refugee can legitimately claim concrete hardship if that person is excluded", the court said. There remain questions about how those "personal relations" will be defined.
The court goes on to define relationships that would qualify: for individuals, a family relationship; for students, admittance to a college or university; for workers, a job offer.
"It's very disappointing that the Supreme Court today will allow a partial version of this ban to take effect". The Department of Homeland Security and the State Department pledged to implement the decision in an orderly fashion. The 50,000 uh limit that president Trump had in his executive order also doesn't apply to them. Unfortunately, many of those who will be affected are overseas and it may be difficult-at least at first-to know how US officers overseas are interpreting the stay's language.
State courts had ruled against the businessman.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has scant margin for error given united Democratic opposition, and can afford to lose only two Republicans from his 52-member caucus. The four liberal justices were silent.
The justices granted parts of his administration's emergency request to put the order into effect immediately while the legal battle continues.
Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, said the government has shown it is likely to succeed on the merits of the case, and that it will suffer irreparable harm with any interference.
The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, said the ban was "rooted in religious animus" toward Muslims and pointed to Trump's campaign promise to impose a ban on Muslims entering the country as well as tweets and remarks he has made since becoming president.